Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Bonding Agent

By Joe Moore

Almost every day we read or hear about tragedies in the news: earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, fires, mass killings. As human beings, even the most distant, obscure news of fellow humans losing their lives or encountering other tragedies usually draws some emotion, even if it’s fleeting. But unless we’re directly connected—a bonding agent—with the people in those news stories, our emotional reaction and interest is often shallow at best. Why? Because we know virtually nothing about them. They are just numbers and statistics. If we take the time to read the article, we may see some additional details that make the people involved more real. There may be a human interest angle that grabs our attention for a moment or two before we turn the newspaper page or click on the next link. But basically, we don’t care deeply because we have no emotional connection with them.

As writers, when it comes to our readers, if they have little or no emotional connection with the characters in our books, they won’t care what happens to them. And if they don’t care, we’re in trouble.

An emotional connection is created when a reader formulates conclusions about our characters’ personalities based on what we show the characters doing and saying. It’s not good enough for the narrator to “tell” the reader what a brave and generous guy our protagonist is or that our antagonist is a heinous villain. We have to show the reader through the characters’ actions, dialogue, interior thoughts and reasoning, and the way they treat others and their life choices from one situation to the next. Then a connection can start to form.

A solid approach to establishing each of these is to ask: what would you do? How would you react to a situation that you’ve created in your story? It doesn’t matter whether you’re assuming the persona of the protagonist, antagonist, secondary character or a mere walk-on. You are a human and so are they. They should act and react like humans, think like humans, and reason like humans. Only when they do will the reader form the critical bond or connection. Otherwise, all you have is two-dimensional paper-doll cutouts lacking depth and dimension.

Some helpful techniques include using universal experiences. Who has not told a lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings? Who hasn’t been faced with deciding between what’s right and what’s easy? Who hasn’t felt animosity or even hate for someone who has wronged you? When your character is in a similar situation, examine how you would react?

If you want your reader to like your character, analyze what it is that makes you like or love someone in real life. Use those emotional traits to build your character. And the opposite is also true. To create a character you want the reader to hate or despise, look for someone you dislike and figure out why. Are they egotistical, self-centered, mettlesome, cold, cruel, or mean? Utilize those universal feelings to build a strong antagonist. But never lose sight of the fact that you’re dealing with humans. Even Hannibal Lecter and Darth Vader had strong human characteristics, good and bad.

One universal element that we all can relate to is pain—both physical and mental. Don’t be afraid to dish out the pain when it comes to developing your characters. It’s okay to put pain in their path because it gives them an opportunity to overcome something and by doing so become stronger or wiser or both. Pain, like any other obstacle, is an opportunity for character growth.

The more human you can make your characters, the better chance you’ll have of your readers forming a connection with them. Always consider how you would react, then have your characters act in a similar, logical manner. And throw in a shot of pain once in a while to keep things interesting.

Have you ever stopped reading a novel because you couldn’t connect to the character(s)? Perhaps you stopped because you just didn’t care who lived or died? What character, either series or standalone, have you formed a strong bond with? What was the bonding agent? Which character is the most memorable?
------------------------------
BAM! Just Like That, an original short story by Lynn Sholes & Joe Moore. Download for $0.99 and get the first 13 chapters of THE PHOENIX APOSTLES as a bonus preview.

13 comments:

BK said...

Interestingly enough, a recent example of a bonding agent comes in the form of a TV series, not a book. In the new Five-0 (now in season 2) I really haven't liked the Danny Williams character at all--b/c in season 1, he frequently came across as an egotistical, unteachable jerk.

FINALLY, they provided this viewer with what I think of as a bonding agent several episodes into the second season. We know from early on in the series that he hates Hawaii and calls it a "pineapple infested hell-hole." But you're thinking, who in their right mind would prefer NEW JERSEY over Hawaii?

But in season 2 they give us a new tidbit--he had an old dog that died while in quarantine in Hawaii when he moved there.

Now THAT is a bonding agent to me. If I had known that about him in the first season, I would've cut him more slack because anything dog-related presses my buttons.

In terms of books, it's the same sort of thing. I might not have experience as a gunslinger who turns his life around with the help of someone who becomes my best friend, but I know loyalty and devotion to those who would do anything for me and I for them. Those are the stories that hook you and don't let go.

Joe Hartlaub said...

Joe, thanks for this. I don't believe I've ever read/heard this concept discussed in quite this manner, and it's really, really helpful. And BK,I'm with you on the dogs.

Paula Millhouse said...

Thanks, Joe. Good points here.

I just read "Fresh Kills" this weekend, and I loved your short story "Final Flight". I connected to Major Howard Murphy when he feared he wouldn't get that plane up off the runway. Too cool.

One series character I've bonded to is Patrick Bowers in Steven James series The Bowers files. It's not so much how he figures out/catches the bad guys that gets me, it's how angry Patrick feels about the bad guys and wounded and helpless he feels about the victims that draws me in. How he feels about his family, his odd and yet lovable step-daughter, and even his co-workers that makes him jump off the page for me.

I felt that way about Alex Cross, too.

Dare I say in Hannibal Rising I almost understood why Hannibal turned out the way he did when I realized how much he loved his little sister...almost, though I hated what he did.

In my novel Careful, I gave Tony Aiello emotions you don't count on a hit-man having, and in the end, what he does surprised even the toughest of my male beta readers. Now they want to know more about Tony because I gave him an emotional bonding agent.

Joe Moore said...

BK, your Five-0 reference is exactly what I’m talking about. You’ve identified an excellent example of a bonding agent. Make readers connect with even the slightest human element will give you a much better chance of holding them through the story. Plot rarely has anything to do with it. The bonding agent is the glue that holds the story together.

Thanks, Joe H. Coming from you, that’s a major compliment.

Paula, I’m really glad you enjoyed FRESH KILLS. It’s a collection of great stories from my blogmates. FINAL FLIGHT was fun to write, and I’m glad you bonded with the pilot, Major Murphy. Regarding Dr. Lecter, I read HANNIBAL RISING, too. Although I agree with you that knowing the background about his sister explains to some extent his actions, the bonding agent for me in all the books was his love of fine art and gourmet food. My degree is in fine art, so there’s my connection right away. And although I can’t often afford to eat in high-end restaurants, I love a great meal. My appreciation for Dr. Lecter’s tastes helped me “like” him, despite his actions. I hate what he does, but I wouldn’t mind having a nice Chianti with him, as long as I’m not the main course. Good luck with your book.

Timothy Fish said...

One of the reasons many disaster movies don’t work for me is because the writers get so caught up in the concept that the world is about to explode, or whatever, and they forget that this means something to someone. Independence Day is one of the few disaster movies that did it well. Even though it is about the threat of the world population being destroyed, it focuses on individual stories.

Joe Moore said...

Timothy, I agree that INDEPENDENCE DAY worked well because we knew so much about the characters. Memorable for me is Jeff Goldblum’s character always concerned about recycling cans and Styrofoam cups, and claiming he was just doing his part to save the planet. An hour later in the film, he does just that. I recycle every day and can relate to his commitment to doing his part.

Another disaster flick that was equally great from a human perspective is DEEP IMPACT. The scene with Tea Leoni and her father standing on the shore as the giant killer wave comes at them is highly emotional. And their relationship prior to that is the bonding agent.

James Scott Bell said...

Joe, I use that same term when I teach workshops, the "reader bond" with the Lead character. That's task #1 for the writer. And you're so right about show, not tell. I remember cracking up when I decided to read a romance novel by a really big name author in the genre. On page 2 was something along these lines: "She was smart, talented, beautiful and everyone loved her, responding to her magnetic personality."

I just snorted and said out loud, "Oh really? And I should believe you why?"

I didn't even finish page 2.

Joe Moore said...

You're right, Jim. I've been stopped cold with that same type of telling many times in the past. Nowdays, I sample on my Kindle first, and if I run into that type of writing, I click delete. Couldn't be easier.

Clare said...

The main reason I stop reading a book is because don't care about the characters- plot flaws are much easier to overlook. The bonding agent is so important - thanks for the reminder!

Basil Sands said...

I use duct tape and eye glue.

Basil Sands said...

Actually Bernard Cornwell's Arthur series really grabbed me by making me identify with or sympathize with several characters that actually had me caring to point I couldn't wait for the next book to come out.

Really great when an author can do that. Something I strive for in my own work.

Joe Moore said...

Absolutely, Clare. It's almost impossible that a novel can stand on plot alone.

Basil, I considered the title Super Glue for my post. You're always one step ahead of me. :-)

Nancy J. Cohen said...

I see character motivation as a bonding agent. Often guilt drives my protagonist, because it's an emotion I can very well relate to myself. And who among us hasn't felt guilt in our relationships to others at some time in our lives?