- The rehash of past literary detectives - enough with Sherlock Holmes already! The only one who has pulled this off (in my mind) is Laurie R King and she created her own terrific character in Mary Russell on top of pulling off the aged beekeeping Holmes with aplomb...but for everyone else - enough!
- The 'other perspective' gimmick - Does the world really need Mr Knightly's diary? What next - Uriah Heep's peeping tom memoirs? Confessions of a rake by Mr Willoughby?
- The never ending sequel - Once a classic is done, it's done as far as I'm concerned - so I don't need to read Mr. Darcy's Daughters or Pemberley the sequel (the latter was particularly bizarre I felt, though I confess I did read it!). The only 'sequel' I appreciated was the two books written by Jill Paton Walsh based on Dorothy L. Sayers unfinished notes.
- Real life historical figures as sleuths....I'm just not buying the King/Queen who can sneak out of court and go sleuthing...
Now don't get me wrong, some people have managed to pull off these things and more power to them if their book sells. Jasper Fforde has a hilarious series featuring Thursday Next that spoofs all sorts of literary figures (I particularly loved the therapy session for the cast of Wuthering Heights in which Healthcliff [now a porn star known as the Black Stallion] arrives and then the session is disturbed by a bomb thrown by the pro-Catherine faction) - but unless you can achieve that level of sublime satire, I say, leave well alone.
In this environment, however, everyone seems to want the easy fix - the 'hook' that will draw in the sales without having to do the hard work of creating new 'jump off the page' characters. Call me old fashioned but the classics of tomorrow are not going to be reheated leftovers from previous classics - or are they? I sometimes wonder and despair...